NATO has condemned what it called “dangerous” nuclear rhetoric from Russia after the Kremlin said it would view any use of nuclear weapons against Russian forces as an act of aggression. The comments from Russia’s ambassador to NATO, Alexander Grushko, came in response to remarks from US President Donald Trump, who said last week that he would be willing to use nuclear weapons to defend the US from attack. In a statement, NATO said it was “concerned” by Russia’s comments and called on Moscow to “its rhetoric”.”Nuclear weapons must never be except in extreme circumstances of self-defense, and then only when the survival of the state is at stake,” the statement said.”Any use of nuclear weapons would be a clear violation of international law.”NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg also warned that “the use of nuclear weapons can never be a military solution”.”We call on Russia to de-escalate tensions and to engage in a constructive dialogue with the United States to avoid misunderstandings and reduce the risk of miscalculation,” he said. The US and Russia are both signatories
1. NATO condemns dangerous Russian nuclear rhetoric
In recent weeks, Russia has been ratcheting up its nuclear rhetoric, with top officials warning that the country is to use nuclear weapons in response to a NATO attack. This dangerous rhetoric is completely unacceptable, and NATO has now condemned it in the strongest possible terms.
In a statement released on Tuesday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that “any use of nuclear weapons would be catastrophic” and that “there is no justification for nuclear weapons, and they must never be .” He also stressed that NATO’s policy of nuclear deterrence “is defensive and is not directed against Russia.”
These comments come in response to a series of worrying statements from Russian officials. Last week, for example, the head of the Russian air force warned that Russia was to use nuclear weapons if NATO forces tried to enter Russian airspace. And earlier this month, a senior Russian diplomat said that his country would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if it felt its “very existence” was.
Such rhetoric is, and it has no place in a civilized world. It is vital that Russia returns to a more constructive and cooperative relationship with NATO, and that it starts to act under international law.
2. NATO says Russia’s nuclear rhetoric is ‘dangerous’ and ‘unacceptable’
In recent weeks, Russia has been ratcheting up its nuclear rhetoric, with top officials warning that the country is to use nuclear weapons in response to a NATO attack. These comments have been by NATO, with the alliance’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg describing them as “dangerous” and “unacceptable.”
Russia’s nuclear rhetoric is causing concern. The country has a massive nuclear arsenal, and any suggestion that it might use those weapons in a conflict is troubling. But, it’s important to remember that Russia is not the only country with nuclear weapons and that NATO also has a very sizable nuclear arsenal of its own.
In the end, what matters most is not the size of a country’s nuclear arsenal, but its willingness to use those weapons. And on that front, NATO has made it very clear that it would not hesitate to use its own nuclear weapons in response to a Russian attack.
3. NATO demands Russia stop its ‘dangerous’ nuclear rhetoric
In recent days, NATO has condemned Russia’s “dangerous” nuclear rhetoric, demanding that Moscow stop its provocations and return to compliance with international arms control agreements.
The tensions between NATO and Russia have been on the rise in recent months, with both sides exchanging accusations and threats. On Wednesday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that Russia’s nuclear rhetoric is “unjustified” and “dangerous.”
“We call on Russia to stop its dangerous rhetoric and provocations,” Stoltenberg said. “Russia should return to compliance with the INF Treaty and other international arms control agreements.”
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which was by the United States and the Soviet Union in 1987, bans the development and deployment of ground-launched missiles with a range of 500-5,500 kilometers.
Russia has been in violation of the treaty for several years, and the United States has accused Moscow of deploying a new cruise missile that falls within the prohibited range. Russia has denied the allegations, claiming that the missile in question is not covered by the treaty.
NATO’s demands come amid increasing concerns about the risk of a nuclear conflict between the United States and Russia. In October, U.S. President Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw from the INF Treaty, citing Russia’s violations.
Russia has warned that it will also withdraw from the treaty if the United States does so, and has said that it will develop new missiles that are not covered by the agreement.
The INF Treaty is not the only arms control agreement that is at risk of collapse. The New START Treaty, which imposes limits on the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy, is set to expire in February 2021.
The Trump administration has said that it is not interested in extending the treaty, and has accused Russia of violating the agreement. Russia has denied the allegations and has called on the United States to extend the treaty.
The collapse of the INF Treaty and the end of the New START Treaty would drop all restrictions on the number of nuclear weapons that the United States and Russia can deploy. This would increase the
4. NATO Secretary General calls on Russia to stop its ‘dangerous’ nuclear rhetoric
Since the early 1990s, NATO has been working to build a constructive relationship with Russia. This has been a key priority for NATO, given the size of Russia’s territory, its military capabilities, and its nuclear arsenal.
In recent years, but, relations between NATO and Russia have become strained. This is due in large part to Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its continued support for separatists in eastern Ukraine. In response to these actions, NATO has taken many steps to increase its own military capabilities and readiness, as well as support its partners in Eastern Europe.
One of the most recent developments in this ongoing tension is the exchange of nuclear rhetoric between NATO and Russia. In late March, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg condemned Russia’s “dangerous” nuclear rhetoric, saying that it was “destabilizing and dangerous.” He also called on Russia to stop its “pattern of behavior” that is to undermine NATO and its members.
Stoltenberg’s comments came in response to a speech by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in which he accused NATO of trying to undermine Russia’s nuclear deterrent. Lavrov also said that Russia was not interested in a new arms race, but that it would not hesitate to defend itself if necessary.
The exchange of nuclear rhetoric between NATO and Russia is the latest development in a tense relationship. As both sides continue to increase their military capabilities and readiness, the risk of an accidental or unintentional conflict between them only grows. It is important that both sides take steps to de-escalate the situation and avoid any further escalation.
5. NATO warns Russia over ‘dangerous’ nuclear rhetoric
Recently, NATO has been warning Russia about its dangerous nuclear rhetoric. In particular, NATO is about Russia’s recent statements suggesting that it might use nuclear weapons in response to a conventional attack.
Such rhetoric is irresponsible and dangerous, and it undermines international efforts to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in global security. Nuclear weapons should only be in extreme circumstances, and their use should be in advance.
NATO is calling on Russia to stop its dangerous nuclear rhetoric and to return to the spirit of arms control and dialogue. Arms control agreements play an important role in reducing the risk of nuclear conflict, and NATO is to working with Russia to preserve and strengthen these agreements.
6. NATO calls on Russia to end ‘dangerous’ nuclear rhetoric
Recently, NATO has called on Russia to end its dangerous nuclear rhetoric. This follows a series of comments made by Russian officials, in which they threatened to use nuclear weapons in response to a potential NATO aggression.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that “these comments are irresponsible and they are dangerous,” and that “they increase the risk of miscalculation and misunderstanding.” He also urged Russia to “follow its international commitments and obligations” when it comes to nuclear weapons.
This is not the first time that NATO has condemned Russian nuclear rhetoric. In 2016, NATO members expressed “serious concern” over comments made by then-Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, in which he said that Russia was to use nuclear weapons in response to NATO aggression.
It is clear that NATO is about the possibility of a nuclear conflict with Russia. And while the alliance is taking steps to defend itself, it is also clear that they want to avoid a nuclear war at all costs.
7. Russia’s nuclear rhetoric ‘dangerous and unacceptable’, says NATO
Recently, NATO has condemned Russia’s nuclear rhetoric as “dangerous” and “unacceptable.” This is in response to a recent statement by a top Russian official that Russia is to use nuclear weapons in response to a NATO attack.
This rhetoric is dangerous and only serves to heighten tensions between Russia and the West. It is also completely unacceptable for a country to threaten to use nuclear weapons in response to a conventional attack.
NATO is right to condemn Russia’s rhetoric and to call on Russia to de-escalate the situation. This is a very serious matter and should not be.
